From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <51BF6619.30404@friocorte.com> References: <5979A385-42FD-4532-8730-8A5BB912AE8E@monkey.org> <51BF6619.30404@friocorte.com> Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2013 10:04:24 +0100 Message-ID: From: Charles Forsyth To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c28308e5fa5004df69ff00 Subject: Re: [9fans] Win starting rc? Topicbox-Message-UUID: 668a10c8-ead8-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 --001a11c28308e5fa5004df69ff00 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On 17 June 2013 20:40, Derek Carter (aka goozbach) wrote: > BTW I'm still using BASH as my $SHELL, I should go 'whole hog' and try > rc, but baby steps... baby steps... > When I switched to /bin/rc on Ubuntu, I found that even the Applications>Terminal windows appeared quickly, compared to whatever shell was being used by default. Of course, with both 9term and rc, windows appear immediately. --001a11c28308e5fa5004df69ff00 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

= On 17 June 2013 20:40, Derek Carter (aka goozbach) <goozbach@friocort= e.com> wrote:
B= TW I'm still using BASH as my $SHELL, I should go 'whole hog' a= nd try
rc, but baby steps... baby steps...

When I swit= ched to /bin/rc on Ubuntu, I found that even the Applications>Terminal w= indows appeared quickly,
compared to = whatever shell was being used by default. Of course, with both 9term and rc= , windows appear immediately.
--001a11c28308e5fa5004df69ff00--