> > If one is running a mail server and has it inside their firewall and if > using one IP then t has to use NAT. Couldn't one presumeably use the setup > above and run a mail server on Plan 9 and bypass having to use NAT? And > also do the same thing for a web server? Yes, I do that. The example you quoted creates two independent IP stacks, starting with the default '#I0' IP stack on ether0, then adding a new IP stack '#I1' connected to ether1 (#l1). There is a separate TCP/IP, UDP/IP, ICMP etc for each stack. I also import /net from a Linux server via Inferno (on Linux) so I can send mail from a non-RBLd address. You can create several types of virtual interface ("medium") on the IP stack, connected to a user-mode process. See pkg and netdev in ip(3) I still have a router with NAT though for non-Plan 9 machines. I never got round to writing a NAT for Plan 9 (which could work in user mode). On Fri, May 8, 2020 at 7:55 PM Robert Sherwood wrote: > I love the idea of importing the external interface to get outside the > network. When I first read about this in Plan9, that's when the system > really "clicked" for me. > > On Fri, May 8, 2020 at 1:08 PM hiro <23hiro@gmail.com> wrote: > >> you can also have multiple ipstacks, working ipv6 and what have you. >> cinap fixed a bunch of stuff in this regard. >> >> it's much more like linux network namespaces now, no limits to your >> creativity... >> >> ------------------------------------------ >> 9fans: 9fans >> Permalink: >> https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/Te43262c53bc71855-M9383be68c88caf7d73dc38d6 >> Delivery options: https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/subscription >> > *9fans * / 9fans / see discussions > + participants > + delivery options > Permalink > >