zfs is very big, complicated and the code looks ancient. I did not enjoy working with it. On Sat, 8 Apr 2023 at 08:51, hiro <23hiro@gmail.com> wrote: > fixing another couple deadlocks makes you finally consider ditching fossil? > zfs storage isn't always permanent either, for example if you use > encryption or deduplication. > > On 4/6/23, Lucio De Re wrote: > > On 4/6/23, noam@pixelhero.dev wrote: > >> Quoth Charles Forsyth : > >>> fussing about certain things for hard drives that probably don't matter > >>> for > >>> SSD let alone nvme > >> > >> I am once again asking you to be more specific, please :) > >> > >> I have Plans for improving venti for myself, it'd be great to actually > >> have a specific list of issues that others have noticed! > >> > > I presume that fossil doesn't apply special treatment to SSD and NVME > > which to my limited understand could be a serious downside. I guess > > I'm asking whether one should seriously consider ditching the > > fossil/venti combination and consider centralising permanent storage > > on something like ZFS instead? > > > > Lucio. ------------------------------------------ 9fans: 9fans Permalink: https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/T354fe702e1e9d5e9-M0d0a1ec97cd26b13e9294866 Delivery options: https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/subscription