Even better might be to do neither: eliminate support for void data, and give the declaration a type that doesn&#39;t provoke so much discussion.<div>It&#39;s just a placeholder.<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On 1 July 2012 23:32, Charles Forsyth <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:charles.forsyth@gmail.com" target="_blank">charles.forsyth@gmail.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div id=":1ao">Yes, I was assuming the same approach as for the existing void data declaration, that the structure is given a nominal size,<div>
for just the reasons you give.  (That&#39;s what gcc seems to do.)</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>