From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <73CCEA09-C492-439D-9E8A-AA2BA9CB93DB@ar.aichi-u.ac.jp> <5E232682-7ABD-4564-96C1-89B1540FC4E2@ar.aichi-u.ac.jp> <23396C1E-C0AC-4DC5-B511-97B307ECB3A4@ar.aichi-u.ac.jp> Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2016 12:33:35 +0000 Message-ID: From: Charles Forsyth To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b5d8695e53b82052bba1b8f Subject: Re: [9fans] bug in exportfs Topicbox-Message-UUID: 84299a58-ead9-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 --047d7b5d8695e53b82052bba1b8f Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On 13 February 2016 at 14:26, Charles Forsyth wrote: > I really wonder about the pattern-matching code being there at all. One interesting thing about the implementation is that it goes so far as to edit the result of directory reads, so excluded names can't be seen in ls. --047d7b5d8695e53b82052bba1b8f Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

= On 13 February 2016 at 14:26, Charles Forsyth <charles.forsyth@gma= il.com> wrote:
I really won= der about the pattern-matching code being there at all.
<= br>One interesting thing about the implementation is that it goes so far as= to edit the result of directory reads,
so = excluded names can't be seen in ls.
--047d7b5d8695e53b82052bba1b8f--