From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CANE8QwcUD+ap9jXAo-=4BYDwsUMd6aCbn08tmiHfSr88xm-3tA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <a76458dfd06fb48b58b559b2e5fdad94@pi.att>
	<CAOw7k5jwTxQ7fXrrnip6_hRi4tAFLpU0sqnZyxQcKfN835a8QQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<20140508013839.Horde.wae3OotgWyZlA6O725OpyQ1@ssl.eumx.net>
	<d032af1bdde883d6ca28965e81ea12f6@mikro.quanstro.net>
	<CANE8QwcUD+ap9jXAo-=4BYDwsUMd6aCbn08tmiHfSr88xm-3tA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu,  8 May 2014 15:20:34 +0100
Message-ID: <CAOw7k5ggP0nyitbSovZs0n-gNGi727UVh9_=qn=cyaZJ-mcEmw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Charles Forsyth <charles.forsyth@gmail.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c258dc2a1eb604f8e42f32
Subject: Re: [9fans] [GSOC] plan9 which arch code to use?
Topicbox-Message-UUID: e3393a68-ead8-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

--001a11c258dc2a1eb604f8e42f32
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

On 8 May 2014 15:14, balaji <balaji.srinivasa+plan9@gmail.com> wrote:

> To a lot of lurkers it's still not clear what the labs amd64 binaries
> are. bootable kernel? commands?
>

it turned out that it didn't include any of it, except the compilers. i am
attempting to address
this oversight.

--001a11c258dc2a1eb604f8e42f32
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8

<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On 8 May 2014 15:14, balaji <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:balaji.srinivasa+plan9@gmail.com" target="_blank">balaji.srinivasa+plan9@gmail.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div id=":4rv" class="a3s" style="overflow:hidden">To a lot of lurkers it&#39;s still not clear what the labs amd64 binaries<br>

are. bootable kernel? commands?</div></blockquote></div><br>it turned out that it didn&#39;t include any of it, except the compilers. i am attempting to address</div><div class="gmail_extra">this oversight.</div></div>

--001a11c258dc2a1eb604f8e42f32--