From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <81ab20f06c1b8b20cf869565b01e2e29@chula.quanstro.net> References: <81ab20f06c1b8b20cf869565b01e2e29@chula.quanstro.net> Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 18:02:30 +0000 Message-ID: From: Charles Forsyth To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0015175cfb7eab005704b6a9047a Subject: Re: [9fans] small dns improvements Topicbox-Message-UUID: 5d4e034e-ead7-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 --0015175cfb7eab005704b6a9047a Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 that one's not inherently fatal, in the sense that it shouldn't stop the search. On 16 January 2012 17:13, erik quanstrom wrote: > 2. we're ignoring status codes that we should be treating as fatal (like > Srvfail) --0015175cfb7eab005704b6a9047a Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable that one's not inherently fatal, in the sense that it shouldn't sto= p the search.

On 16 January 2012 17:13, e= rik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net> wrote:
2. =C2=A0we're ignoring status codes tha= t we should be treating as fatal (like Srvfail)

--0015175cfb7eab005704b6a9047a--