From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <90633615ea9185870208e11290f42eb7@proxima.alt.za>
References: <755c0af9d04658f3d757fd5e5f29dd92@proxima.alt.za>
	<90633615ea9185870208e11290f42eb7@proxima.alt.za>
Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2011 13:20:44 +0100
Message-ID: <CAOw7k5h+Ryu5O-wFTBq7x3RJsQKUnKMmbVqKX_OfDVSf_2z2bw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Charles Forsyth <charles.forsyth@gmail.com>
To: lucio@proxima.alt.za,
	Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Subject: Re: [9fans] nanosleep()?
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 3bc95bec-ead7-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

well, in the particular case of profiling, i suspect you might find
that you can do
a better job by using or adapting some existing Plan 9 facilities for the same.

just take unsuitable things out of the mkfiles, since no other system
is using those.
On 28 October 2011 13:05, Lucio De Re <lucio@proxima.alt.za> wrote:>
On the other hand, if the tools can be made to work correctly besides>
compiling successfully, it will improve the likely acceptance of Go>
and that ought to be a good thing.