zfs is very big, complicated and the code looks ancient. I did not enjoy working with it.

On Sat, 8 Apr 2023 at 08:51, hiro <23hiro@gmail.com> wrote:

fixing another couple deadlocks makes you finally consider ditching fossil?
zfs storage isn't always permanent either, for example if you use
encryption or deduplication.

On 4/6/23, Lucio De Re <lucio.dere@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 4/6/23, noam@pixelhero.dev <noam@pixelhero.dev> wrote:
>> Quoth Charles Forsyth <charles.forsyth@gmail.com>:
>>> fussing about certain things for hard drives that probably don't matter
>>> for
>>> SSD let alone nvme
>>
>> I am once again asking you to be more specific, please :)
>>
>> I have Plans for improving venti for myself, it'd be great to actually
>> have a specific list of issues that others have noticed!
>>
> I presume that fossil doesn't apply special treatment to SSD and NVME
> which to my limited understand could be a serious downside. I guess
> I'm asking whether one should seriously consider ditching the
> fossil/venti combination and consider centralising permanent storage
> on something like ZFS instead?
>
> Lucio.

------------------------------------------
9fans: 9fans
Permalink: https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/T354fe702e1e9d5e9-Md68125af550af6687f52fa58
Delivery options: https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/subscription