From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20131219060725.7EB64B82A@mail.bitblocks.com>
References: <CABwHSOv=p17DeO_VHfY1DuX4H_h18eZ2qbVmCHyZrpd5NE6CVA@mail.gmail.com>
	<3e1e9e6fbfa856a01013a2f51b8d244f@coraid.com>
	<CABwHSOuTCu8HyLHis3ifWgF8harJ8rM2+8=Okr8cumk4BHS6CQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<34270f8ddb3fc06e71d4db496a891dd4@brasstown.quanstro.net>
	<20131219060725.7EB64B82A@mail.bitblocks.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2013 10:59:09 +0000
Message-ID: <CAOw7k5hWyrcojJ7d2US6iX8yjsMh8zY+Mpdee=pLR-MAf3o7jg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Charles Forsyth <charles.forsyth@gmail.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d04138c290b0ad604ede10d2c
Subject: Re: [9fans] mk time-check/slice issue
Topicbox-Message-UUID: a0b2402c-ead8-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

--f46d04138c290b0ad604ede10d2c
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

On 19 December 2013 06:07, Bakul Shah <bakul@bitblocks.com> wrote:

> I suppose making atime, mtime of type struct timespec would
> break too much including 9p?
>

It's unfortunate that the times in the protocol have low resolution.
I think ix does better.

--f46d04138c290b0ad604ede10d2c
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8

<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On 19 December 2013 06:07, Bakul Shah <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:bakul@bitblocks.com" target="_blank">bakul@bitblocks.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div id=":m9" style="overflow:hidden">I suppose making atime, mtime of type struct timespec would<br>
break too much including 9p?</div></blockquote></div><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">It&#39;s unfortunate that the times in the protocol have low resolution.</div><div class="gmail_extra">I think ix does better.</div>
</div>

--f46d04138c290b0ad604ede10d2c--