From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <564b10c396c5747d9cc94ad0fcbb641b@coraid.com> References: <564b10c396c5747d9cc94ad0fcbb641b@coraid.com> Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 17:04:58 +0100 Message-ID: From: Charles Forsyth To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00151759338c1bc67804c0297b68 Subject: Re: [9fans] rc behavior with rfork Topicbox-Message-UUID: 8fc6c4f0-ead7-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 --00151759338c1bc67804c0297b68 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 yes, it's a little unusual that opening a file doesn't create a constant connection to that file (while it lasts), separating the i/o from (for instance) the effect of OTRUNC On 16 May 2012 16:44, erik quanstrom wrote: > but on the face of it (that is, without thinking too hard), > it seems incorrect > --00151759338c1bc67804c0297b68 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable yes, it's a little unusual that opening a file doesn't create a con= stant connection to that file (while it lasts),
separating the i/o from= (for instance) the effect of OTRUNC

On 16 May 2012 16:44, erik quanstrom <quanstro@labs.coraid.com&= gt; wrote:
but on the face of it (that is, without thinking too hard)= ,
it seems incorrect

--00151759338c1bc67804c0297b68--