From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20111028095914.GA17766@dinah>
References: <ee63d9a7f805df3527102105f5144a93@proxima.alt.za>
	<CAP6exY+RbaZaKePeW-NxbAjyQn36CW0sGSjSbNeQezGwG+osow@mail.gmail.com>
	<20111028095914.GA17766@dinah>
Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2011 11:25:14 +0100
Message-ID: <CAOw7k5he5auCahj-thQdxYjbUNs48b0SHg5XMFsu68gD-3i0BQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Charles Forsyth <charles.forsyth@gmail.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Subject: Re: [9fans] nanosleep()?
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 3ba1e5bc-ead7-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

>Implementing nanosleep() does not require enormous resolution,
>although there are complications.

well, yes. it requires that struct timespec crud as well.
the interaction with signals doesn't seem to be relevant.

at least it doesn't use ptrace directly!