From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20121029223541.8C198B827@mail.bitblocks.com>
References: <15723310.yIARpoJMSL@coil>
	<4824335454f1b1d47dbc8439b4af8ea3@kw.quanstro.net>
	<20121029223541.8C198B827@mail.bitblocks.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2012 22:47:02 +0000
Message-ID: <CAOw7k5hvkWuoD0dLR57Q0xw-6RKJgfHOxD1scdpK48nE_Xuhcw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Charles Forsyth <charles.forsyth@gmail.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b3a7fe2a72ef604cd3a7293
Subject: Re: [9fans] caveat... optimizer? the `zero and forget' thread on HN
Topicbox-Message-UUID: cc1ac794-ead7-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

--047d7b3a7fe2a72ef604cd3a7293
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

He can fool it once, but can he fool it twice? Can he recompile?

On 29 October 2012 22:35, Bakul Shah <bakul@bitblocks.com> wrote:

> But it is easy to fool compilers to do what he wanted

--047d7b3a7fe2a72ef604cd3a7293
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8

He can fool it once, but can he fool it twice? Can he recompile?<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On 29 October 2012 22:35, Bakul Shah <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:bakul@bitblocks.com" target="_blank">bakul@bitblocks.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">But it is easy to fool compilers to do what he wanted </blockquote></div><br>

--047d7b3a7fe2a72ef604cd3a7293--