From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <9748601494866680@web4g.yandex.ru> References: <9748601494866680@web4g.yandex.ru> From: Charles Forsyth Date: Tue, 16 May 2017 10:24:45 +0100 Message-ID: To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c0950aa205aa0054fa0be6c" Subject: Re: [9fans] equality sign in Rc Topicbox-Message-UUID: bdd55ed6-ead9-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 --94eb2c0950aa205aa0054fa0be6c Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" On 15 May 2017 at 17:44, trebol wrote: > > = is part of rc syntax, like {} and (), and it interprets it, not the i'd forgotten about the = in >[2=1], so you'd need another exception ... rc would interpret that, but then in [a-b=] it presumably wouldn't again... --94eb2c0950aa205aa0054fa0be6c Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

= On 15 May 2017 at 17:44, trebol <trebol55555@yandex.ru> = wrote:
> =3D is part of rc syntax, lik= e {} and (), and it interprets it, not the

i'd fo= rgotten about the =3D in >[2=3D1], so you'd need another exception .= ..
rc would interpret that, but then in [a-= b=3D] it presumably wouldn't again...
--94eb2c0950aa205aa0054fa0be6c--