From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <cefb1d9c5e3559828ce2062e325142ee@proxima.alt.za>
References: <CAOw7k5ho=y-6azAAqbJ0o9TyGFVW6LtQFxhzCeQw07C=6GezFw@mail.gmail.com>
	<cefb1d9c5e3559828ce2062e325142ee@proxima.alt.za>
Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2011 17:09:31 +0100
Message-ID: <CAOw7k5i21Lf=cLFtYK9+tp-1wfLTJkCCXtEU+b9VTZTToyZ+4w@mail.gmail.com>
From: Charles Forsyth <charles.forsyth@gmail.com>
To: lucio@proxima.alt.za,
	Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Subject: Re: [9fans] ARM compiler shortcoming?
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 3c69861c-ead7-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

sorry, i was misleading. i meant a 5c that does vlongs more directly,
not a 5c that does the new arm 64-bit operations. that compiler would
have a different name.

> i've got a 5[acl] tucked away that does 64-bit operations