Quoth unobe@cpan.org:
> Quoth ori@eigenstate.org:
> > Our compilers will sometimes produce a warning about
> > a non-interruptible temporary:
> > ...
> > Why do we warn about non-interruptible
> > temporaries? What issues am I missing?
>
> Silence to this question means no one knows, right?
>

I pinged Charles off list and got a response -- it means
we're falling into the rathole; in other words, we're
accessing a global variable.

The right thing to do (IMO) is make the compiler allocate
on the stack, and then the warning would be unneded.


------------------------------------------
9fans: 9fans
Permalink: https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/Tdcfb8f84c90eb199-Ma608800db7356d10a02c4b44
Delivery options: https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/subscription