[9fans] 8c - is this leagal?

[9fans] 8c - is this leagal?

[Steve Simon]

I'am trying (again) to build svn for plan9 native.

8c is blowing up with the error:

	bad in naddr: NAME cache_init_state

the offending like is:

  static volatile svn_atomic_t cache_init_state = 0;

Is this legal c code, static and volatile?

if it is anyone any ideas how to fix 8c - compilers are a closed book to me.

-Steve

Re: [9fans] 8c - is this leagal?

[Charles Forsyth]

static is scope, volatile has dynamic effects, very dynamic. you
should be able to #define volatile
to nothing (-Dvolatile'=') and it will usually work. certainly for
statics and externals.
the one real effect it might have is on automatic variables if the
usage in conjunction
with setjmp is a little strange (straightforward uses are fine with setjmp).

On 21 November 2012 13:21, Steve Simon <steve@quintile.net> wrote:
> Is this legal c code, static and volatile?

Re: [9fans] 8c - is this leagal?

[Charles Forsyth]

 >static volatile svn_atomic_t cache_init_state = 0;

svn_atomic_t? has it got its own thread library? coroutines?

Re: [9fans] 8c - is this leagal?

[Charles Forsyth]

By which I meant that yes, it's legal ANSI C code to combine them. The
strange way the compiler implements volatile references probably led
to that odd diagnostic.
As I said, I'd try nopping the volatile.

On 21 November 2012 13:30, Charles Forsyth <charles.forsyth@gmail.com> wrote:
> static is scope, volatile has dynamic effects, very dynamic.

Re: [9fans] 8c - is this leagal?

[Steve Simon]

Thanks for the comments,

I dropped the volatile and that bit compiles,
I am getting close I think.

And in answer to charles, there is all sorts going on in there.

counting the semicolons gives:

Apache portable utils		16049
Apache portable runtime 	24852
sqlite3						43944
subversion					343690
Total						428535

and for context:

/sys/src/9					107216

-Steve

Re: [9fans] 8c - is this leagal?

[erik quanstrom]

> and for context:
>
> /sys/src/9					107216

half of that is for obsolete pc drivers.

- erik

Re: [9fans] 8c - is this leagal?

[Bence Fábián]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 493 bytes --]

8c is for Plan9's C dialect.
Look into /sys/doc/ape.ps


2012/11/21 Steve Simon <steve@quintile.net>

> I'am trying (again) to build svn for plan9 native.
>
> 8c is blowing up with the error:
>
>         bad in naddr: NAME cache_init_state
>
> the offending like is:
>
>   static volatile svn_atomic_t cache_init_state = 0;
>
> Is this legal c code, static and volatile?
>
> if it is anyone any ideas how to fix 8c - compilers are a closed book to
> me.
>
> -Steve
>
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 906 bytes --]

Re: [9fans] 8c - is this leagal?

[Dan Cross]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 214 bytes --]

On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 8:30 AM, Bence Fábián <begnoc@gmail.com> wrote:

> 8c is for Plan9's C dialect.
> Look into /sys/doc/ape.ps
>

This was not a useful answer to Steve's question.

        - Dan C.

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 612 bytes --]

Re: [9fans] 8c - is this leagal?

[Bence Fábián]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 312 bytes --]

yeah i realized since. sorry


2012/11/21 Dan Cross <crossd@gmail.com>

> On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 8:30 AM, Bence Fábián <begnoc@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> 8c is for Plan9's C dialect.
>> Look into /sys/doc/ape.ps
>>
>
> This was not a useful answer to Steve's question.
>
>         - Dan C.
>
>
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1007 bytes --]