I'm sorry that my original terse reply, which was well meant, stirred up a hornet's nest.
I simply didn't know that it wasn't to be found in the two distributions you mentioned
(I did know it was certainly in 9front).

On Sun, 22 May 2022 at 19:18, Charles Forsyth <charles.forsyth@gmail.com> wrote:
You enquired about support for an architecture within Plan 9 on a Plan 9 list so the context was clear and I reply with the relevant architecture string to help you locate it, but get a little lecture about Arm's naming scheme (come to think of it, what are Thumb-1 and Thumb-2 called?). Next time, I'll insist on the 27B/6.

On Fri, 20 May 2022, 22:27 adr, <adr@sdf.org> wrote:
On Fri, 20 May 2022, Charles Forsyth wrote:

> Date: Fri, 20 May 2022 21:34:05 +0100
> From: Charles Forsyth <charles.forsyth@gmail.com>
> Reply-To: 9fans <9fans@9fans.net>
> To: 9fans <9fans@9fans.net>
> Subject: Re: [9fans] Aarch64 on labs|9legacy?
>
> It's called arm64

From https://developer.arm.com/documentation/den0024/a/Introduction?lang=en

"AArch64 is the name used to describe the 64-bit execution state
of the ARMv8 architecture. AArch32 describes the 32-bit execution
state of the ARMv8 architecture, which is almost identical to ARMv7.
GNU and Linux documentation (except for Redhat and Fedora distributions)
sometimes refers to AArch64 as ARM64."

I would agree that you could use the therm ARM64 as a synonym of
Aarch64, but giving me just that response... It isn't even funny.

adr.

------------------------------------------
9fans: 9fans
Permalink: https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/T000c7f7d66260ba3-M5cf852a151255c694f902925
Delivery options: https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/subscription