From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2012 09:12:00 +0100 Message-ID: From: Charles Forsyth To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b603c128d795e04c91829b3 Subject: Re: [9fans] Inferno Auth support for plan9 factotum Topicbox-Message-UUID: b73a4d18-ead7-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 --047d7b603c128d795e04c91829b3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sorry. Got distracted with other work. I'll send the current version of the relevant files. That archive was used during the GSoC project, and is unlikely to be up-to-date. On 7 September 2012 09:05, Jiten Pathy wrote: > ok found some code here : > http://code.google.com/p/inferno-spki/source/browse/trunk#trunk%2F9%2Ffactotum. > I will try and see the current status. > > > On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 11:55 PM, Jiten Pathy wrote: > >> can you point me where ? The official factotum has p9any and p9sk* but >> not infauth support. >> >> >> On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 11:42 PM, Charles Forsyth < >> charles.forsyth@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> yes, there are bits for both plan 9 and p9p factotum. >>> >>> >>> On 6 September 2012 11:17, Jiten Pathy wrote: >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> I was looking at the auth mechanisms for inferno. Anyone have done any >>>> work to add support for inferno's public crypto auth mechanism based on >>>> diffie-hellman to plan9 factotum ? >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> Jiten >>>> >>> >>> >> > --047d7b603c128d795e04c91829b3 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sorry. Got distracted with other work. I'll send the current version of= the relevant files.
That archive was used during the GSoC project, and= is unlikely to be up-to-date.

On 7 Septe= mber 2012 09:05, Jiten Pathy <jpathy@mail.nanosouffle.net>= ; wrote:
ok found some code here : http://code.google.com/p/inferno-spki/source/browse/trunk#t= runk%2F9%2Ffactotum. I will try and see the current status.


On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 11:55 PM, Jiten Pathy= <jpathy@mail.nanosouffle.net> wrote:
can you point me where ? The official factotum has p9any and p9sk* but not = infauth support.


On Wed, Sep 5,= 2012 at 11:42 PM, Charles Forsyth <charles.forsyth@gmail.com&= gt; wrote:
yes, there are bits for both plan 9 and p9p = factotum.


On 6 September 2012 11:17, Jiten Pathy <jpathy@mail.nanosouffle.= net> wrote:
Hi,
I was looking at the auth mechanisms = for inferno. Anyone have done any work to add support for inferno's pub= lic crypto auth mechanism based on diffie-hellman to plan9 factotum ?

Regards,
Jiten




--047d7b603c128d795e04c91829b3--