From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2014 10:32:15 +0100 Message-ID: From: Charles Forsyth To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d0442832e73b96f05050e396e Subject: Re: [9fans] Failed 'reject' function? Topicbox-Message-UUID: 195a4524-ead9-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 --f46d0442832e73b96f05050e396e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 10 October 2014 10:28, Pavel Klinkovsk=C3=BD wrote: > reject incoming connection, which failed. reject should probably swallow the error return from the ctl file write, as accept does, until tcp/ip and others interpret the control request and either reset the connection there, or ignore the request and act on the close. --f46d0442832e73b96f05050e396e Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

= On 10 October 2014 10:28, Pavel Klinkovsk=C3=BD <pavel.klinkovsky= @gmail.com> wrote:
reject = incoming connection, which failed.

reject should prob= ably swallow the error return from the ctl file write, as accept does, unti= l
tcp/ip and others interpret the control r= equest and either reset the connection there,
or ignore the request and act on the close.
--f46d0442832e73b96f05050e396e--