From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 20 May 2016 23:25:59 +0100 Message-ID: From: Charles Forsyth To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11442b6c3a1eb405334d93ec Subject: Re: [9fans] bug in authdial() Topicbox-Message-UUID: 911aa7b6-ead9-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 --001a11442b6c3a1eb405334d93ec Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On 20 May 2016 at 23:04, Skip Tavakkolian <9nut@9netics.com> wrote: > i'm a little confused by the discussion of il + tcp on authdial > causing the delay. if ndb/cs returns multiple dial strings, dialmulti > function (/sys/src/libc/9sys/dial.c) dials them all in parallel > (rfork) and the first one that returns, wins. > 9front uses the original sequential one --001a11442b6c3a1eb405334d93ec Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

= On 20 May 2016 at 23:04, Skip Tavakkolian <9nut@9netics.com> = wrote:
i'm a little confused by the discussion of il + tc= p on authdial
causing the delay.=C2=A0 if ndb/cs returns multiple dial strings, dialmulti=
function (/sys/src/libc/9sys/dial.c) dials them all in parallel
(rfork) and the first one that returns, wins.

9= front uses the original sequential one
--001a11442b6c3a1eb405334d93ec--