From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4ogvg9xkdh.ln2@news.homelinux.net>
References: <CAOEdRO0Qq2ptPf1p39PjMRaaAB9-KRNMRsFBmV+b_a2WNa=g5Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<1450673.A5MVcxN6dG@coil> <4ogvg9xkdh.ln2@news.homelinux.net>
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 16:10:39 +0100
Message-ID: <CAOw7k5is8oDQLoDY9KHPRVsqVNV4q0+=CT8UaUOFRHeSpuqQ3A@mail.gmail.com>
From: Charles Forsyth <charles.forsyth@gmail.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b3440f43aae7504c868f6d5
Subject: Re: [9fans] rc vs sh
Topicbox-Message-UUID: b37fff38-ead7-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

--047d7b3440f43aae7504c868f6d5
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Changing my default shell from bash to rc caused even terminal windows (let
alone 9term ones) to appear almost instantly on Ubuntu
(9term windows appear instantly on the click).

We slowly standardise on slow standards, with degradation everywhere.

--047d7b3440f43aae7504c868f6d5
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Changing my default shell from bash to rc caused even terminal windows (let=
 alone 9term ones) to appear almost instantly on Ubuntu<div>(9term windows =
appear instantly on the click).</div><div><br>We slowly standardise on slow=
 standards, with degradation everywhere.</div>
<div><br></div>

--047d7b3440f43aae7504c868f6d5--