From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Charles Forsyth Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2019 16:23:42 +0100 Message-ID: To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000465cf5058e9721fc" Subject: Re: [9fans] Plan 9 C compiler for Xtensa CPUs Topicbox-Message-UUID: 031e5e3e-eada-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 --000000000000465cf5058e9721fc Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" I'd need a letter or number and thought about reusing x (xa/xc/xl) since the AT&T DSP is long gone On Fri, Jul 26, 2019 at 11:30 AM Charles Forsyth wrote: > I was thinking of doing that since I've got an ESP-32 for some reason > > On Fri, Jul 26, 2019 at 7:38 AM Cyber Fonic wrote: > >> I was reading the post Why Didn't Plan 9 Succeed >> on Hacker News. >> >> Made me think that Plan 9 for IoT system of systems could be viable. >> >> To that end, ESP-32 modules look capable enough to run Plan 9, but is >> there a Plan 9 C compiler for Xtensa ISA CPUs? >> >> --000000000000465cf5058e9721fc Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I'd need a letter or number and thought about reusing = x (xa/xc/xl) since the AT&T DSP is long gone

On Fri, Jul 26, 2019 at 11:= 30 AM Charles Forsyth <charles.forsyth@gmail.com> wrote:
I was thinking of d= oing that since I've got an ESP-32 for some reason

On Fri, Jul 26, 2019= at 7:38 AM Cyber Fonic <cyberfonic@gmail.com> wrote:
I was reading the post=C2= =A0Why Didn't Plan 9 Succeed=C2=A0on Hacker News.

=
Made me think that Plan 9 for IoT system of systems could be viable.

To that end, ESP-32 modules look capable enough to = run Plan 9, but is there a Plan 9 C compiler for Xtensa ISA CPUs?=C2=A0

--000000000000465cf5058e9721fc--