From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sun, 8 Jun 2014 18:50:30 +0100 Message-ID: From: Charles Forsyth To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7ba971ba0f06b104fb56bb60 Subject: Re: [9fans] duppage Topicbox-Message-UUID: f7f9f4b0-ead8-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 --047d7ba971ba0f06b104fb56bb60 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On 8 June 2014 18:34, erik quanstrom wrote: > well, those are the measurements. do you think they are misleading? > perhaps > with the pio happening in another context? i haven't hunted this down. > the difference is only how fault makes the copy (easy or hard), there shouldn't be any call to pio either way. --047d7ba971ba0f06b104fb56bb60 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

= On 8 June 2014 18:34, erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net> wrote:
well, those are the measurements. =C2=A0do you think they are = misleading? =C2=A0perhaps
with the pio happening in another context? =C2=A0i haven't hunted this = down.

the difference is only how fault makes th= e copy (easy or hard), there shouldn't be any call to pio either way.
--047d7ba971ba0f06b104fb56bb60--