From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <3edc1641001c2e8d7f7e55f7a029ea7f@proxima.alt.za>
References: <CAOw7k5h_55DNYEy8vQZ-JOwYxzEUG8LLUHWfZQcerM84ra=Pgw@mail.gmail.com>
	<3edc1641001c2e8d7f7e55f7a029ea7f@proxima.alt.za>
Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2011 12:42:03 +0100
Message-ID: <CAOw7k5iv-S4iBW_-Dn1YUUa7naNoiCSitnwLPeCU_6+8AYVxmQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Charles Forsyth <charles.forsyth@gmail.com>
To: lucio@proxima.alt.za,
	Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Subject: Re: [9fans] nanosleep()?
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 3bb66f3c-ead7-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

ppmaps might just work (depending on libmach, i suppose).
also, although it's supposed to profile at "regular" real-time intervals,
it seems to assume that regularity will just happen. perhaps it does.