From: Charles Forsyth <charles.forsyth@gmail.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Subject: Re: [9fans] fossil+venti performance question
Date: Wed, 6 May 2015 23:28:52 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAOw7k5j2q963Y_DyObQNVUHmVkrP5Z5UuRtO-9LsWgVtRMk8iQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANUoZoE+7JE_dEaLmaH6Eikv9bk7gv39AVgWRRP3wgv5d5BAqw@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 616 bytes --]
On 6 May 2015 at 22:28, David du Colombier <0intro@gmail.com> wrote:
> Since the problem only happen when Fossil or vacfs are running
> on the same machine as Venti, I suppose this is somewhat related
> to how TCP behaves with the loopback.
>
Interesting. That would explain the clock-like delays.
Possibly it's nearly zero RTT in initial exchanges and then when venti has
to do some work,
things time out. You'd think it would only lead to needless retransmissions
not increased latency
but perhaps some calculation doesn't work properly with tiny values,
causing one side to back off
incorrectly.
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1091 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-06 22:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-04 9:32 KADOTA Kyohei
2015-05-04 16:10 ` Anthony Sorace
2015-05-04 18:11 ` Aram Hăvărneanu
2015-05-04 18:51 ` David du Colombier
2015-05-05 14:29 ` Sergey Zhilkin
2015-05-05 15:05 ` Charles Forsyth
2015-05-05 15:38 ` David du Colombier
2015-05-05 22:23 ` Charles Forsyth
2015-05-05 22:29 ` cinap_lenrek
2015-05-05 22:33 ` David du Colombier
2015-05-05 22:53 ` Aram Hăvărneanu
2015-05-06 20:55 ` David du Colombier
2015-05-06 21:17 ` Charles Forsyth
2015-05-06 21:26 ` David du Colombier
2015-05-06 21:28 ` David du Colombier
2015-05-06 22:28 ` Charles Forsyth [this message]
2015-05-07 3:35 ` erik quanstrom
2015-05-07 6:15 ` David du Colombier
2015-05-07 13:17 ` erik quanstrom
2015-05-08 16:13 ` David du Colombier
2015-05-08 16:39 ` Charles Forsyth
2015-05-08 17:16 ` David du Colombier
2015-05-08 19:24 ` David du Colombier
2015-05-08 20:03 ` Steve Simon
2015-05-08 21:19 ` Bakul Shah
2015-05-09 14:43 ` erik quanstrom
2015-05-09 17:25 ` Lyndon Nerenberg
2015-05-09 17:30 ` Devon H. O'Dell
2015-05-09 17:35 ` Lyndon Nerenberg
2015-05-09 21:54 ` Devon H. O'Dell
2015-05-09 18:20 ` Bakul Shah
2015-05-09 3:11 ` cinap_lenrek
2015-05-09 5:59 ` lucio
2015-05-09 16:26 ` cinap_lenrek
2015-05-09 16:23 ` erik quanstrom
2015-05-10 4:55 ` erik quanstrom
2015-05-10 5:07 ` erik quanstrom
2015-05-10 17:57 ` David du Colombier
2015-05-10 20:18 ` erik quanstrom
2015-05-10 20:19 ` cinap_lenrek
2015-05-10 20:51 ` erik quanstrom
2015-05-10 21:34 ` cinap_lenrek
2015-05-11 1:23 ` erik quanstrom
2015-05-09 16:59 ` erik quanstrom
2015-05-06 22:35 ` Steven Stallion
2015-05-06 23:47 ` Charles Forsyth
2015-05-07 3:38 ` erik quanstrom
2015-05-07 3:43 ` erik quanstrom
2015-05-05 15:07 ` KADOTA Kyohei
2015-05-05 14:47 ` KADOTA Kyohei
2015-05-05 15:46 ` steve
2015-05-05 15:54 ` David du Colombier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAOw7k5j2q963Y_DyObQNVUHmVkrP5Z5UuRtO-9LsWgVtRMk8iQ@mail.gmail.com \
--to=charles.forsyth@gmail.com \
--cc=9fans@9fans.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).