From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <88df240d06e36e23de6dfb42140907e2@brasstown.quanstro.net>
References: <88df240d06e36e23de6dfb42140907e2@brasstown.quanstro.net>
Date: Sun,  2 Dec 2012 11:24:47 +0000
Message-ID: <CAOw7k5j7Dkp-C4rrBB7=2tenKxjGY8wmOj0PMgxjeLG7ADCJ=A@mail.gmail.com>
From: Charles Forsyth <charles.forsyth@gmail.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Subject: Re: [9fans] tprivalloc, tprivfree, tprivaddr
Topicbox-Message-UUID: eee23c44-ead7-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

It's to allocate global names (indices) with per-thread values.

On 1 December 2012 23:42, erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net> wrote:
> what doesn't make sense to me is the allocation tracking is global,
> while the pointers are per-thread Thread.udata[].