From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2013 18:30:43 +0000 Message-ID: From: Charles Forsyth To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec52c5e656868b404d76e0567 Subject: Re: [9fans] unix rsa-key with passphrase vs. p9(p) Topicbox-Message-UUID: 2560ae22-ead8-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 --bcaec52c5e656868b404d76e0567 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On 8 March 2013 18:02, Rudolf Sykora wrote: > Finally, is there any reason to prefer the factotum way rather than the > linux's > way just with ssh-keygen (with a passphrase) + ssh-copy-id + (linux's) > ssh-agent? > All my keys are stored in several secstores ... on the net, not on my local machine. This is even better than having lots of $HOME/.ssh files on every machine, although of course for Linux purposes, I have some of those as well. --bcaec52c5e656868b404d76e0567 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8

On 8 March 2013 18:02, Rudolf Sykora <rudolf.sykora@gmail.com> wrote:
Finally, is there any reason to prefer the factotum way rather than the linux's
way just with ssh-keygen (with a passphrase) + ssh-copy-id + (linux's)
ssh-agent?

All my keys are stored in several secstores ... on the net, not on my local machine.
This is even better than having lots of $HOME/.ssh files on every machine,
although of course for Linux purposes, I have some of those as well.
--bcaec52c5e656868b404d76e0567--