From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2014 10:22:20 +0100 Message-ID: From: Charles Forsyth To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d0421845905b24005050e16c6 Subject: Re: [9fans] Failed 'reject' function? Topicbox-Message-UUID: 1935b966-ead9-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 --f46d0421845905b24005050e16c6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 10 October 2014 08:48, Pavel Klinkovsk=C3=BD wrote: > Do you have any explanation? > Did I make some bug in the program? > Not all network types implement "reject", and the result of reject is therefore usually ignored (since in any case the connection is going to be closed). --f46d0421845905b24005050e16c6 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

= On 10 October 2014 08:48, Pavel Klinkovsk=C3=BD <pavel.klinkovsky= @gmail.com> wrote:
Do = you have any explanation?
Did I make some bug in the program?

Not all network types implement "reject"= , and the result of reject is therefore usually ignored (since in any case = the connection is going to be closed).
--f46d0421845905b24005050e16c6--