From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <68ce90976b22bdb0929ccccafef4b7d0@kw.quanstro.net> <3330200.XJjoRb8JbZ@blitz> <5538fcd345a73fc294c6ee568f2fcdb4@kw.quanstro.net> <8ee568439e1855124564ecf0e83ac2b3@kw.quanstro.net> <6c7d84f203a2cc4f3427e177e34fa9d9@brasstown.quanstro.net> <20120830170241.A8D27B827@mail.bitblocks.com> Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 21:06:17 +0100 Message-ID: From: Charles Forsyth To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d044281045217d204c8813586 Subject: Re: [9fans] rc's shortcomings (new subject line) Topicbox-Message-UUID: b531cfdc-ead7-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 --f46d044281045217d204c8813586 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable That's true, but the C compiler also does each .c in parallel up to NPROC. On 30 August 2012 18:18, erik quanstrom wrote: > > Even more common than reduce is map. No reason why you can't > > parallelize > > > > 8c *.c > > we already do=E2=80=94with mk. > --f46d044281045217d204c8813586 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable That's true, but the C compiler also does each .c in parallel up to NPR= OC.

On 30 August 2012 18:18, erik quanstr= om <quanstro@labs.coraid.com> wrote:
> Even more common than= reduce is map. No reason why you can't
> parallelize
>
> =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 8c *.c

we already do=E2=80=94with mk.

--f46d044281045217d204c8813586--