From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAFUtaNGtWHwKHBfup5fgn1nSuaxOxDx_cw2o6ChrXuZJqzkqPw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAFUtaNGtWHwKHBfup5fgn1nSuaxOxDx_cw2o6ChrXuZJqzkqPw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2013 17:01:54 +0000
Message-ID: <CAOw7k5jfUXv4hWn0VRoe1c4XCtVu+2VrPmtgZ3kNKPNtLbTPzg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Charles Forsyth <charles.forsyth@gmail.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e010d8574aab30304d7f998d6
Subject: Re: [9fans] ISO C and typestr
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 2a8f1956-ead8-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

--089e010d8574aab30304d7f998d6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

On 15 March 2013 16:52, Joel C. Salomon <joelcsalomon@gmail.com> wrote:

> BTW, the C11 standard includes a restricted form of 9c's anonymous
> sub-structs (with no pointer conversion).
>

isn't the pointer conversion most of the point of them?

--089e010d8574aab30304d7f998d6
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8

<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On 15 March 2013 16:52, Joel C. Salomon <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:joelcsalomon@gmail.com" target="_blank">joelcsalomon@gmail.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div id=":12v">BTW, the C11 standard includes a restricted form of 9c&#39;s anonymous<br>
sub-structs (with no pointer conversion).</div></blockquote></div><br>isn&#39;t the pointer conversion most of the point of them?</div></div>

--089e010d8574aab30304d7f998d6--