From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <alpine.OSX.1.10.1112011153090.649@peregrinwifi.orthanc.ca>
References: <20111201174858.GA23075@dinah>
	<CAL4LZyjptQ=QScwYyMurt0OFSd6kAgz4nZnaqYxmwU-Ruxu0YA@mail.gmail.com>
	<20111201181455.GC23075@dinah>
	<CAOw7k5ioi2HOhQXQvDtu2ynY5HtTnzDFzK7aRoOtSXa_dkgufw@mail.gmail.com>
	<alpine.OSX.1.10.1112011025230.649@peregrinwifi.orthanc.ca>
	<20111201190724.GA12324@dinah>
	<alpine.OSX.1.10.1112011153090.649@peregrinwifi.orthanc.ca>
Date: Thu,  1 Dec 2011 22:34:22 -0800
Message-ID: <CAP6exYKdMstU2C5WoovVYmmsMZw1q13uhVDK2gGe70y1A_Sfag@mail.gmail.com>
From: ron minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [9fans] Building Go on Plan 9
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 4a9ccb4a-ead7-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 11:54 AM, Lyndon Nerenberg <lyndon@orthanc.ca> wrote=
:
>> There's nothing wrong with mk. =A0It's just that
>> I highly doubt we could get a separate set of
>> mkfiles included in the Go distribution.
>
> Have you tried? =A0It's a non-invasive change, and once they are set up i=
t's
> unlikely they will need to be updated often.
>
>

I've tried. The answer is "no". No mkfiles in the tree. I've not
watched this thread. Is this another totally different approach?

ron