From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAOw7k5gFL5WwzjmsQ7ckghqgO2dqACv+vjyET_76bzfJEbWm5Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAP6exYL5KwdwKGM-KkFboHXpTt+Xv7o7WnHLm08OPGY1QX-xmg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAOw7k5gFL5WwzjmsQ7ckghqgO2dqACv+vjyET_76bzfJEbWm5Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri,  9 May 2014 15:05:43 -0700
Message-ID: <CAP6exYLJfhowT8qGb02F1M7QxqcMdraZkT+qD2VAESv=NGqv2A@mail.gmail.com>
From: ron minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Subject: Re: [9fans] what arch
Topicbox-Message-UUID: e53d4b60-ead8-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 2:46 PM, Charles Forsyth
<charles.forsyth@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 9 May 2014 21:37, ron minnich <rminnich@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> under the Inferno license for that matter
>
>
> that's usually MIT

Yeah. Either 3 clause BSD or MIT work. Many others don't. So whichever
one of those floats your boat, those of you have authored new software
might consider relicensing under one of them. Again, just a
suggestion.

ron