not so much what I want, I'm curious about ideas people have about implementing it that I would not think of. On Fri, Apr 5, 2024 at 1:38 PM Gorka Guardiola wrote: > Hmm sorry. Now I see what you want. Not to rewalk. You can use the chan of > the dirfd and walk just the remainder cloning it and creating a new one. > That way the openat provides the guarantees you want. > > On Fri, Apr 5, 2024, 22:15 Gorka Guardiola wrote: > >> I mean, if you want a new syscall jus copy or call the implementation of >> these. >> >> >> On Fri, Apr 5, 2024, 22:12 Gorka Guardiola wrote: >> >>> ¿Isn't that fd2path, strcat and open? >>> Or am I misunderstanding something? >>> >>> On Fri, Apr 5, 2024, 21:51 ron minnich wrote: >>> >>>> One of the folks I worked with, when we pulled a big chunk of plan 9 >>>> into akaros, commented that he had implemented openat on akaros. >>>> >>>> I don't want this to turn into a debate on the merits of openat; I am >>>> more curious: if you went to implement openat on Plan 9, how would you go >>>> about it? I have a few ideas but I'm more interested in your ideas. >>>> >>>> Thanks >>>> >>> *9fans * / 9fans / see discussions > + participants > + delivery options > Permalink > > ------------------------------------------ 9fans: 9fans Permalink: https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/T675e737e776e5a9c-M0445ed55bee993d4cfbd3450 Delivery options: https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/subscription