did you track down why the unexpected concurrency was happening? thiscould result in other bugs as well.- erik
On Tuesday, May 13, 2014 8:34:29 AM UTC-4, Alexander Sychev wrote:There were problems in p9p under linux, when amail makes simultaneous searches in different windows.On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 4:23 PM, quanstro <quan...@gmail.com> wrote:
in theory the threads that interact with regular expressions in acmeare all cooperatively scheduled. have you seen a case where theyare not? did pthreads blow up the model?- erik
On Tuesday, May 13, 2014 7:11:02 AM UTC-4, Alexander Sychev wrote:Hi,I have commited some changes in my experimental fork of plan9port.
For acme I made thread safe processing of regular expressions (actually by creating some context).For upas/nfs I made a monitoring of all mailboxes and a decoding of international names of mailboxes.I'm living with these changes for some time, they are working.P.S.By the way, new log feature is excellent, it's a time to make more applications for acme :-)--
Best regards,santucco--To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to plan9port-de...@googlegroups.com.
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "plan9port-dev" group.--
Best regards,santucco--
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "plan9port-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to plan9port-dev+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.