From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: "James A. Robinson" <jim.robinson@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2016 16:07:24 +0000
Message-ID: <CAPd04b64HXgUErK4mGG5pJ3Nb-JBkCjZGYPm5RGvS8F8GRXbWw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f403045dafe6eb45d205402b67e5
Subject: [9fans] fossil vs. fossil+venti in 9atom installation?
Topicbox-Message-UUID: a7d7725e-ead9-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

--f403045dafe6eb45d205402b67e5
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

I was looking over the 9atom install script and I saw it appeared
to code in support for building filesystems based on kfs,
fossil, or fossil+venti, but it only surfaced kfs and fossil+venti.

I was wondering why that was.  Does anyone know?

Jim

--f403045dafe6eb45d205402b67e5
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr">I was looking over the 9atom install script and I saw it a=
ppeared<div>to code in support for building filesystems based on kfs,</div>=
<div>fossil, or fossil+venti, but it only surfaced kfs and fossil+venti.</d=
iv><div><br></div><div>I was wondering why that was.=C2=A0 Does anyone know=
?</div><div><br></div><div>Jim</div><div><br></div></div>

--f403045dafe6eb45d205402b67e5--