From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: "James A. Robinson" Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2016 14:48:12 +0000 Message-ID: To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113f213030d44a053fedf3a2 Subject: Re: [9fans] acme tag bars stacking Topicbox-Message-UUID: a73d99ae-ead9-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 --001a113f213030d44a053fedf3a2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 I suspect one reason for placing the stack at the bottom is that it gives you a consistent area to target, at the top, when going back to work on your primary window. If they were stacked top down then, depending on how many files you had open, you might have to more carefully target how to get back to your primary edit window. Jim --001a113f213030d44a053fedf3a2 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I suspect one reason for placing the stack at the bottom is that it giv= es
you a consistent area to target, at the to= p, when going back to work on your
primary wi= ndow.=C2=A0 If they were stacked top down then, depending on how many
=
files you had open, you might have to more careful= ly target how to get back
to your primary edi= t window.

Jim

--001a113f213030d44a053fedf3a2--