From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <72921bad1cfbc2b3e2a46a5fed0dedc0@debpi> In-Reply-To: <72921bad1cfbc2b3e2a46a5fed0dedc0@debpi> From: "James A. Robinson" Date: Sat, 21 May 2016 17:07:28 +0000 Message-ID: To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=94eb2c09b6f6860d9405335d3e5a Subject: Re: [9fans] 9front sam in plan9port. Topicbox-Message-UUID: 92340778-ead9-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 --94eb2c09b6f6860d9405335d3e5a Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Sat, May 21, 2016 at 9:33 AM wrote: > No, it appears to be the 9front version (2014, with mouse chords in > samterm/main.c ), ported to plan9port. > Ok, the wording on that site is a bit odd to me. The name plan9port is a project Russ Cox wrote, so the wording A port of 9front's version of sam(1) to unix (plan9port) seemed to imply porting 9front's sam(1) to plan9port. That didn't make sense to me since Russ's plan9port sam goes back many many years earlier than the 2014 timestamp in that repo you pointed at. Jim --94eb2c09b6f6860d9405335d3e5a Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Sat, May 21= , 2016 at 9:33 AM <trebol55555@yandex.ru> wrote:
No, it appears to be the 9front version (2014, with mouse chords in samterm= /main.c ), ported to plan9port.

Ok, the wording on that site is = a bit odd to me.=C2=A0 The name plan9port is a project Russ Cox=C2=A0wrote, so the wording

=
A port of 9front's version of sam(1) to unix= (plan9port)=C2=A0

seemed to imply porting 9fro= nt's sam(1) to plan9port. That didn't make sense to me since Russ&#= 39;s plan9port sam goes back many many years earlier than the 2014 timestam= p in that repo you pointed at.

Jim

--94eb2c09b6f6860d9405335d3e5a--