From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.3 \(3445.6.18\))
From: Rui Carmo <rui.carmo@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAFSF3XN05uQ2Ud6xh-JN0542CHBMdaa+Mrs3TeMCr6wn72RiAA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu,  5 Apr 2018 23:40:33 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <CEADB3CF-EECE-4736-A7BB-3E1CF05C3139@gmail.com>
References: <46180584f55326f1df30061986ba28cf@hamnavoe.com>
	<BA4D9781-54BA-43C0-AA71-6DC047739727@quintile.net>
	<101AB299-83B9-432C-BA7A-E28FBB0057CA@bitblocks.com>
	<CAFSF3XN05uQ2Ud6xh-JN0542CHBMdaa+Mrs3TeMCr6wn72RiAA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Subject: Re: [9fans] Plan9 on Pi 3B+
Topicbox-Message-UUID: d3d97c80-ead9-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

They=E2=80=99re still under the same baseline SoC constraints (plus the =
USB bus).=20

Biggest constraint for me is the lack of RAM, though.

R.

> On 5 Apr 2018, at 23:13, hiro <23hiro@gmail.com> wrote:
>=20
> "The Python performance with this new Raspberry Pi 3 is now in line
> with the Pine A64.
> While the PHP performance is between the Pine A64 and ODROID-C2"
>=20
> from this test it sounds they didn't care much about typical
> scientific supercomputing...
> and their udp throughput test is slower than the tcp one?!
>=20
> either they are doing something completely braindamaged or the
> hardware is still just garbage.
>=20