From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.5 \(1508\)) From: Jeff Sickel In-Reply-To: Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2013 16:52:31 -0500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <52096C35.5070805@Gmail.com> <5e328d31c29d3575f5e363335d9d6a93@coraid.com> <52098D6C.5070904@Gmail.com> <161EA096-2077-41E2-B28E-EE811E15884C@gmail.com> <520A1F6F.8030604@Gmail.com> To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net> Subject: Re: [9fans] Python3 for Plan9 Topicbox-Message-UUID: 716c1748-ead8-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 Just remember that there is a small mercurial dependency that's = currently not fully tracked. Our patches to Selenic have started to be rolled in, but = it may still take a few more days before a Mercurial 2.7.1 release that has all = of our changes in place. Feel free to track the cpython bitbucket fork for our most recent = changes. The mercurial pieces will be updated in short order. And, as time = allows, I'll try my best to remember to push changes up to my contrib area on = sources. -jas On Aug 13, 2013, at 11:40 PM, michaelian ennis = wrote: > I think you will find most things sought after from python 3 are = available in 2.7. In addition there is a plan9 module included giving = you the building blocks to build plan9-centric tools. = https://bitbucket.org/jas/cpython >=20 > Ian >=20 >=20 > On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 4:58 AM, Devyn Collier Johnson = wrote: >=20 > On 08/12/2013 10:12 PM, Matthew Veety wrote: > No it is. Just use the compilers for the other arch. >=20 > On Aug 12, 2013, at 21:35, Devyn Collier Johnson = wrote: >=20 > On 08/12/2013 07:23 PM, erik quanstrom wrote: > On Mon Aug 12 19:15:36 EDT 2013, devyncjohnson@gmail.com wrote: > Aloha Plan9 fans! >=20 > I am new to Plan9 and I plan to use it for robotics. However, I = am > unable to find a Python3 interpreter that would run on a Plan9 system = on > an ARM system. Does such a package exist? > not out o the box, but jas' python port on bitbucket is close. we = haven't > tried out python 3 yet, and we've been ignoring arm but we are = following > the tip, so python 3 might just work on 386/amd64. >=20 > i- erik > Thanks anyway. I am new to cross compiling, so I assume it is not as = easy as downloading the source code and compiling? >=20 > Mahalo, >=20 > DevynCJohnson@Gmail.com >=20 >=20 > Thanks! I will try that sometime. >=20 > Mahalo, >=20 > DCJ >=20 >=20