From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.3) In-Reply-To: <3e1162e60708101534o1652d167w37786aa28ab8ab26@mail.gmail.com> References: <53d983d7773b2f1c70e739c17b1f6e56@terzarima.net> <8022be3a725afcd644aa206cfa327074@quintile.net> <13426df10708100922m30da88d2h4eedb082a78a9012@mail.gmail.com> <5d375e920708101228u4b86f15dv715bf50f57ee6e82@mail.gmail.com> <70A20023-DFBF-4F10-B13A-81B2E05C6727@telus.net> <3e1162e60708101534o1652d167w37786aa28ab8ab26@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="Apple-Mail-24-172596852" Message-Id: From: Paul Lalonde Subject: Re: [9fans] 9fans content Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 15:41:50 -0700 To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@cse.psu.edu> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Topicbox-Message-UUID: a64b1ce4-ead2-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --Apple-Mail-24-172596852 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-23-172596815 --Apple-Mail-23-172596815 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed On 10-Aug-07, at 3:34 PM, David Leimbach wrote: > I'm sorry to hear it's not well structured. > Less a problem of structure of gsoc than of a mismatch between how the plan9 community operates, the gsoc expectations, and my over- expectations. I think Uriel did a great job getting something organized and off the ground. I'm just not sure that as an "organization" we're a good match - I think we just don't have enough developers on most of our projects to get a good head of steam going for most students. Paul > Paul > > On 10-Aug-07, at 12:28 PM, Uriel wrote: > > > The plan9-tech list was created (not by me) after various gsoc > > students *and* mentors plain refused to use 9fans, and really, > who can > > blame them when even jmk refuses to use 9fans anymore. > > > > Anyway, keep jumping to assumptions, bashing people who tries to > help, > > and doing what you have doing so far, it seems to have worked really > > well. > > > > uriel > > > > P.S.: Oh, I know, you would rather have everyone use private email, > > that has worked so wonderfully so far. > > > > On 8/10/07, ron minnich wrote: > >> On 8/10/07, Steve Simon < steve@quintile.net> wrote: > >> > >>> good one uriel, good one. > >> > >> so, set me straight on this: somone is leading the tribe of True > >> 3lite > >> Hackers across the desert, gonna part the waters etc., take 'em to > >> the > >> promised land, and so on. > >> > >> So, uh, who are these tech contributors who are going? I can only > >> gaze > >> in awe. And, once they get there, I assume they'll take a > blanket off > >> the blanket tree and take a nap (ref. to CM Kornbluth is entirely > >> intentional; I'll let you find story and title). > >> > >> ron > >> p.s. met the coraid guys at linux world yesterday. Very, very fine > >> stuff. I love the fact that they are 'the linux storage company'. > >> > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin) > > iD8DBQFGvOOlpJeHo/Fbu1wRAhwVAKCHRJquefKgAFfSnZugJgWuLWbRzgCf fgBy > y4b5mvW20Q7QpgdsoQqfIN4= > =mYF7 > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > --Apple-Mail-23-172596815 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1

On 10-Aug-07, at = 3:34 PM, David Leimbach wrote:

I'm sorry to hear it's not well = structured.=A0

Less a problem of structure of = gsoc than of a mismatch between how the plan9 community operates, the = gsoc expectations, and my over-expectations.=A0 I think Uriel did a = great job getting something organized and off the ground.=A0 I'm just = not sure that as an "organization" we're a good match - I think we just = don't have enough developers on most of our projects to get a good head = of steam going for most students.

Paul

Paul

On 10-Aug-07, at 12:28 PM, Uriel = wrote:

> The plan9-tech list was created (not by me) after = various gsoc
> students *and* mentors plain refused to use 9fans, = and really, who can
> blame them when even jmk refuses to use = 9fans anymore.
>
> Anyway, keep jumping to assumptions, = bashing people who tries to help,
> and doing what you have doing = so far, it seems to have worked really
> well.
>
> = uriel
>
> P.S.: Oh, I know, you would rather have everyone = use private email,
> that has worked so wonderfully so = far.
>
> On 8/10/07, ron minnich <rminnich@gmail.com> = wrote:
>> On 8/10/07, Steve Simon < steve@quintile.net> = wrote:
>>
>>> good one uriel, good = one.
>>
>> so, set me straight on this: somone is = leading the tribe of True
>> 3lite
>> Hackers across = the desert, gonna part the waters etc., take 'em to
>> = the
>> promised land, and so on.
>>
>> So, = uh, who are these tech contributors who are going? I can = only
>> gaze
>> in awe. And, once they get there, I = assume they'll take a blanket off
>> the blanket tree and take = a nap (ref. to CM Kornbluth is entirely
>> intentional; I'll = let you find story and title).
>>
>> ron
>> = p.s. met the coraid guys at linux world yesterday. Very, very fine =
>> stuff. I love the fact that they are 'the linux storage = company'.
>>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: = GnuPG v1.4.5 = (Darwin)

iD8DBQFGvOOlpJeHo/Fbu1wRAhwVAKCHRJquefKgAFfSnZugJgWuLWbRzg= Cf fgBy
y4b5mvW20Q7QpgdsoQqfIN4=3D
=3DmYF7
-----END PGP = SIGNATURE-----

= --Apple-Mail-23-172596815-- --Apple-Mail-24-172596852 content-type: application/pgp-signature; x-mac-type=70674453; name=PGP.sig content-description: This is a digitally signed message part content-disposition: inline; filename=PGP.sig content-transfer-encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin) iD8DBQFGvOmupJeHo/Fbu1wRAnE+AKCBeCOfsYIEjwazMXfnWsPQPN6R1gCg0F9K k2EVyfMEs/OnLz/bchbme7Y= =tn56 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail-24-172596852--