From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
References: <CAOr72miC+-2+K1OXco4Ykz5BDnMJjfY9NPaaMx=yTYAwns3ONg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAGGHmKHv62Ug5hWFkb6r1FraAL00XRrNFvSrGjMy1KrUJqAOTA@mail.gmail.com>
	<20130531200615.GA91523@intma.in>
	<CAGGHmKEEs96bBBLhU9qWK9A4sA8rbURs4JARdcA1MBqZyQJNkQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Matthew Veety <mveety@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=us-ascii
In-Reply-To: <CAGGHmKEEs96bBBLhU9qWK9A4sA8rbURs4JARdcA1MBqZyQJNkQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-Id: <D71B2E98-56D4-4EDF-A6D8-E6D725C6AEB8@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 31 May 2013 23:56:46 -0400
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Subject: Re: [9fans] Fossil disk usage over 100%?
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 5e4923fe-ead8-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025


> Fossil still feels foreign to me, though I'm attempting to change that.

You misspelled unstable. You have more sack than I could ever say I have for=
 putting anything mildly important on fossil.