Re: [9fans] upas : without acme : possible?

[sl@9front.org]

> is that "mail" you mention similar to "mailx" under unix-like systems?
> the problem is one of not wanting a captive user-interface to the
> mailing sub-system.

On Plan 9, 'mail' is a shell script that invokes either nedmail(1) or
marshal(1), depending on the flags it consumes.

The nedmail program is nearly identical, from a user interface
standpoint, to the mail command that shipped with the 8th edition of
Research UNIX.  It remains part of the same (though evolved) e-mail
processing system, upas.

Ned is a little different than mailx(1), but it's probably just about
what you're looking for.

Plan 9's mail system itself (upas) relies heavily upon upasfs(4),
filter(1), and simple rc scripts, which make even complex tasks
like custom spam filtering and automatic mailbox management
trivial.

sl