From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2018 22:32:20 -0500 From: sl@9front.org To: 9fans@9fans.net In-Reply-To: 20181129155852.GA69882@wopr MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [9fans] upas : without acme : possible? Topicbox-Message-UUID: efd65fca-ead9-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 > is that "mail" you mention similar to "mailx" under unix-like systems? > the problem is one of not wanting a captive user-interface to the > mailing sub-system. On Plan 9, 'mail' is a shell script that invokes either nedmail(1) or marshal(1), depending on the flags it consumes. The nedmail program is nearly identical, from a user interface standpoint, to the mail command that shipped with the 8th edition of Research UNIX. It remains part of the same (though evolved) e-mail processing system, upas. Ned is a little different than mailx(1), but it's probably just about what you're looking for. Plan 9's mail system itself (upas) relies heavily upon upasfs(4), filter(1), and simple rc scripts, which make even complex tasks like custom spam filtering and automatic mailbox management trivial. sl