From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.2 \(1499\)) From: Jeff Sickel In-Reply-To: <47D4B247-AE2A-4356-9E79-21293DBCE75E@9srv.net> Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2013 12:25:12 -0600 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <0BE4B21D-EDA9-4DF5-8515-7BA27841B3E3@corpus-callosum.com> <47D4B247-AE2A-4356-9E79-21293DBCE75E@9srv.net> To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net> Subject: Re: [9fans] APE select() and awkward Python subprocess PIPEfitting Topicbox-Message-UUID: 2038a634-ead8-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 On Feb 26, 2013, at 10:48 AM, Anthony Sorace wrote: > I believe that's about the old X11 port. fgb's equis is much newer and = nicer (aside from, y'know, X11). That's the one forest against (for = anyone who's going to try). While we're at it, does anyone have an answer to why we have both /sys/include/ape/select.h /sys/include/ape/sys/select.h =46rom what I can tell it was a result of the cut being copied to the new release: ; ls -l select.h sys/select.h --rw-rw-r-- M 3198 glenda sys 779 Dec 11 1999 select.h --rw-rw-r-- M 3198 glenda sys 779 Feb 28 2002 sys/select.h I motion we rm /sys/include/ape/select.h and keep the per most other posix-like systems. -jas