Re: [9fans] pico

[Pietro Gagliardi <pietro10@mac.com>]

This only happens with black/white images, I ran a color image (boyd)  
through and it worked fine. I think it's with the run function...

On Jan 29, 2008, at 3:33 PM, Pietro Gagliardi wrote:

> In the latest update, I tried adding differentiating between color  
> and b/w images. However, I can't test anything because every time I  
> try a line like
>
> 	x new = dennis
>
> I get something that ends in "(double-free?)" and then the program  
> crashes, but something like
>
> 	x new
> 	x new =
>
> do call the error() function. The lexer did not change since I  
> started this update, but it did change when I improved symbol  
> handling.
>
> On Jan 29, 2008, at 12:30 AM, Bruce Ellis wrote:
>
>> well i agree that russ did a good job but JITs are fun and often
>> make things 10 times faster.
>>
>> brucee
>>
>> On Jan 29, 2008 11:30 AM, Pietro Gagliardi <pietro10@mac.com> wrote:
>>> Wow, that's very impressive!
>>>
>>>        open: /tmp/something does not exist (2x)
>>>        no image lerp
>>>        no image doug
>>>
>>> But you have a preview, which I was going to add soon.
>>>
>>> I am sticking with my code interpreter because I know how to use one
>>> (I toiled over hoc. and fossil ate my code up last December) and it
>>> doesn't require hooking to a C compiler. I do like the preprocessor
>>> idea though.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Jan 28, 2008, at 6:36 PM, Russ Cox wrote:
>>>
>>>>> Byron Rakitzis (of posix rc fame) produced a version popi with the
>>>>> JIT
>>>>> compiler, though sadly his where for cpus which are common cpus
>>>>> these days.
>>>>
>>>> Computers and compilers are fast enough now
>>>> that you can get away with just feeding code
>>>> into a C compiler instead of writing a full JIT.
>>>> And there's no porting to do!
>>>>
>>>> I just put a pico on sources that does this - 738 lines,
>>>> not many of which are the "JIT".
>>>>
>>>> 9fs sources
>>>> cd /n/sources/contrib/rsc/pico
>>>> mk demo
>>>>
>>>> Russ
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>