From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 References: <20120316193646.GA2789@polynum.com> <8ed57c744c8ba6e26f2b320d0dcf36dd@brasstown.quanstro.net> <19c5b6bf683e73fd097a915089b21087@brasstown.quanstro.net> From: steve Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <19c5b6bf683e73fd097a915089b21087@brasstown.quanstro.net> Message-Id: Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2012 18:21:49 +0000 To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Subject: Re: [9fans] Plan 9 rejected from GSoC 2012 Topicbox-Message-UUID: 6b9840fe-ead7-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 I feel plan9 is the only thing worthy of me spending my time and effort on, and i do (when i can). -Steve On 19 Mar 2012, at 02:16 AM, erik quanstrom wrote: >> Agreed - people do tend to perform better when working on a project >> they are really invested in. >>=20 >> But if that was true enough, wouldn't tons of people be stepping up to >> support plan9 development? >>=20 >> If not, then obviously it's not worth anyone's time. >=20 > your argument seems to me to be an all-or-nothing logical fallicy. >=20 > i don't think the fact that the plan 9 community is small is an indication= > that it's not worth spending time on. if that were the case, i'd be looki= ng > for a new job right now. as it is, we're hiring. >=20 > - erik