From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
References: <20131108024600.GN11218@iota.offblast.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
In-Reply-To: <20131108024600.GN11218@iota.offblast.org>
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <DCEDB867-5999-42E0-8C08-F940419C2637@gmail.com>
Cc: "9fans@9fans.net" <9fans@9fans.net>
From: Skip Tavakkolian <skip.tavakkolian@gmail.com>
Date: Thu,  7 Nov 2013 23:40:41 -0800
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Subject: Re: [9fans] acid analogues of gdb stepping commands
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 8a016a9c-ead8-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

Isn't step what you're looking for?

> On Nov 7, 2013, at 6:46 PM, Nick Owens <mischief@9.offblast.org> wrote:
>
> 9fans,
>
> i find myself needing to use acid a lot lately, and maybe i am going
> about it wrong. i very much dislike that when i next() in acid, acid
> will step through every subcall. what i would like is that it would
> instead behave more like gdb's next. is this crazy or am i going about
> using acid wrong?
>
> maybe someone has acid analogues of gdb's next, finish, until as
> described here.
>
> https://sourceware.org/gdb/onlinedocs/gdb/Continuing-and-Stepping.html
>
> nick
>