In his Turing Award lecture "The Humber Programmer" he expresses this sentiment.

"the tools we are trying to use and the language or notation we are using to express or record our thoughts, are the major factors determining what we can think or express at all!"

You all may enjoy listening to him!

https://youtu.be/jDvaEiK__B8?list=PL99C1C9F94FB8FA4B&t=127

The above clip is positioned at "Now for the fifth argument." if you just want to read the
relevant paragraph in the transcription below:

https://www.cs.utexas.edu/users/EWD/transcriptions/EWD03xx/EWD340.html

Finally, I very much doubt he would have liked C!


On Dec 3, 2020, at 12:50 AM, Lucio De Re <lucio.dere@gmail.com> wrote:

ewd498 - should suffice for a search.
cs.utexas.edu/users/EWD/index00xx.html seems an interesting place to look.

And I may have paraphrased Dijkstra more strongly than he would have
intended, but I'm sure he'll forgive me.

Lucio.

On 12/3/20, Mart Zirnask <martzirnask@gmail.com> wrote:
PS: I concur with the late Dijkstra that the programming language(s)
you learn shape(s) your ability to construct abstractions in your
mind. We're kind of safe for as long as C remains the base language
for development. All bets are off when Objective C takes over.

Would you mind posting a link to the manuscript/transcript of the
essay where he discusses this?

Thanks,
Mart


--
Lucio De Re
2 Piet Retief St
Kestell (Eastern Free State)
9860 South Africa

Ph.: +27 71 471 3694
Cell: +27 83 251 5824

------------------------------------------
9fans: 9fans
Permalink: https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/T3fd028fcf2eeb24c-M8e29de85dc46d335ddf9a6ed
Delivery options: https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/subscription