From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu Subject: Re: [9fans] source code as data not text From: nigel@9fs.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="upas-opmdibojsahqqdvfvbympfnolh" Message-Id: Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 08:45:16 +0100 Topicbox-Message-UUID: bbe6f0a4-eac9-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --upas-opmdibojsahqqdvfvbympfnolh Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Oh, and the link to SeeSoft is broken too. --upas-opmdibojsahqqdvfvbympfnolh Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Received: from mail.cse.psu.edu ([130.203.4.6]) by cpu; Mon Jun 18 01:32:24 BST 2001 Received: from psuvax1.cse.psu.edu (psuvax1.cse.psu.edu [130.203.4.6]) by mail.cse.psu.edu (CSE Mail Server) with ESMTP id 8EB76199F8; Sun, 17 Jun 2001 20:32:11 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mta01-svc.ntlworld.com (mta01-svc.ntlworld.com [62.253.162.41]) by mail.cse.psu.edu (CSE Mail Server) with ESMTP id D4871199DD for <9fans@cse.psu.edu>; Sun, 17 Jun 2001 20:31:36 -0400 (EDT) Received: from freeze2k ([62.254.2.198]) by mta01-svc.ntlworld.com (InterMail vM.4.01.02.27 201-229-119-110) with SMTP id <20010618003135.CQKL351.mta01-svc.ntlworld.com@freeze2k> for <9fans@cse.psu.edu>; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 01:31:35 +0100 Message-ID: <00d701c0f78d$fb26d750$6401a8c0@freeze2k> From: "Matt" To: <9fans@cse.psu.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200 Subject: [9fans] source code as data not text Sender: 9fans-admin@cse.psu.edu Errors-To: 9fans-admin@cse.psu.edu X-BeenThere: 9fans@cse.psu.edu X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.1 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu List-Id: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans.cse.psu.edu> List-Archive: Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 01:31:13 +0100 Maybe I'm not hard-core enough but one thing I miss is syntax highlighting. And if you go so far as to parse the source code in the editor then you can use the opportunity to develop the idea. There are some good ideas in a paper here http://mindprod.com/scid.html about source code living in a database rather than a plain text file. The basic premise is that when an editor knows about what source code is and does it can offer new views of it etc. Anyone got any views of their own? matt --upas-opmdibojsahqqdvfvbympfnolh--